Clause Wits (3.0)?

Politics is...
Economics is...
Hume or is...*

There should be no doubt that this is the most transparent administration...

Not that I enjoin...**
Nor dot dot dot  [!]. ^

*not to jest
^ow = mo ot (or 3rd ot [?])

g? Clause Wits (3.0)?
A. Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?
B. Speculative Physics
C.
D?  Pre-Pan FRY.
E. Clause Wits
f. Battle of Amendments?

Hint: [ ? ] Caution: links R anachronistic of sorts. (c*^)
** 3-26-14 finally read: NOW NFRY, nfry 2.oh?
[RealPerspectivism / On the wall verses on the table.]

Battle of Amendments?

Or Balance of Fittest ?

Related Flak [?]

[Reboot Reading List]
[No compunction or qualms with how others connect the dots ?]

This in no way* intends to imply that the amendments have any intention of being in any heirarchy, priority or clause.**

* nor weigh ?   [a Lean Forward, b  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (b), c, d Ghost of X-mas Passed. , e One Heckuva Day. , f, g It's Obama's Turn , h The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh! , i Social Darwinism 2.0[!] , j Now this is the ticket. , k Weird Google of the Day. , l Speaking of Bowls, m X & Y Chromo Somes]
** (s.c.) scroll click[Maslow, clause(b.s.), wits]
[Reading List, RE:VIEWING, Reading List (UC) ]

[Face the Music ! ? ! (cheer/leader/ship/?)]

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Politics is (~)football by other means.

Sports is a fertile field for narrative.  Just look at this weekend; the Brady/Manning matchup in the AFC and the Palmer/Newton NFC match up.  Will it be age before Heisman? 

Speaking of Clause Wits[!] *

* not fully read (or viewed football)yet
of / or 
Clause Wits (3.0)?
\
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

[Hume or  ...(~)]
(~)  "the continuation"
"War is the continuation** of politics by other means."
** Relative Exceptionalism

Myth-Buster

"A media parable for "The Center"
by Norman Soloman,
www.OurFuture.org

Speaking of future...
Justice is the whole point of our society. The judgement of history is not enough.

* CLICK HERE for your judgement.

It seems that impeachment is the only remedy. Unless there is some unknown clause that will protect the legal process from pardons, the only abuse of power seems to be that of congress to allow it. That may be the judgement of history.

* Seriously, an action item request.

[In summary this is about the media spin and the political ramifications of missing the center. And also about my Rachel Maddowing superstition going back to pre-Clinton. Meaning: Clinton (Bill) was not my cup of tea, but I opted out emotionally for the good of the country. Look what happened. The country first worked, and then the vast right-wing-conspiracy took over. If these words click you off, then don't link here.

Obama Economy Town Hall

Defending His Record on Economy, Jobs(CNBC)*
Republicans Cry Class Warfare...(The Progressive)
&...Balk @ Obama(...)Proposals they Backed(Bloomberg)

*(see update)Business leader's perspective favors Obama (video approx. 28:00 to 35:30)
[Duoh, stubbed my TOW, (37:00 in) 38:50 infra-structure %GDP]
[Re: social security - it might be only a technical difference but Social Security is a separate issue in the debt picture. While some elements of the discussion/solutions are similar, it may be difficult to discuss simultaneously.]
[Re: Tea Party 40:00 to 44:22 or so, then constitution & commerce clause]
*UPDATE 9-23-10 Top link is good compendium for Obama Town Hall Video as is original asterisk

Clause Wits

...war is politics by other means
I'm sorry... someone*** has made a point of my tangents. But it might be Germane*, or was he Austrian. No.. Prussian and Hegelian.
Could it not be said that economics has been the same, politics by other means?
What about religion?** Is that a valid spin?

*intended spelling
** in an evolutionary sense

[See update paradox of congress regarding line item veto]

*** also bowing to someone I include a definition from spin link:

Clausewitz’s trinity comprises three specific elements. The identity of those elements is readily evident to anyone who actually reads the first paragraph of his description: It is "composed of primordial violence, hatred, and enmity, which are to be regarded as a blind natural force; of the play of chance and probability within which the creative spirit is free to roam; and of its element of subordination, as an instrument of policy, which makes it subject to reason...." (emphasis added). This set of elements is usually labeled "emotion/chance/reason"; sometimes "violence/chance & probability/rational calculation"; or, even more abstractly, "irrationality/nonrationality/rationality."

It would seem that this creates our reality as opposed to an original intent begetting results, let alone values. Oh, but I guess it does. But some just have a different ge oh me try.
[12-15-10 Speaking of timing or tangents(footnote)the original purpose of my blog was to record such leaps, not always capable of recording their inspiration.]
[In the above footnote I succeeded in not loosing that inspiration, though it was close, but we have lost a very important piece in our power portfolio in Richard Holbrooke, may he rest in peace.]

Good Night Joe!

Obamacare Tax Penalty,

Morning Joe.

Good Night Joe!

57% want to keep some form of Obamacare!

And when* the Supreme Court sorts out the tax implications and commerce clause, it will be lights out for opposition to the Affordable Care Act. Not that changes might not be down the road.

*NOW** with Alex Wagner (rumors of demise are similarly exaggerated?)

** too late (well 3-30-12)***

*** NOW with Alex Wagner

FOOTNOTES PAGE THREE ARPIL 2013

4-1-13 C-shells! T-shalls? Oar tangent shall = blog(sc) search. 

4-2-13 Re: cull pas knaught? [?]   (b.s.)Swift: The Irony of the Message (sc),Fiddle Sticks^ , c, Recent Letters., Red Labeling!, Swift Reading! (sc), g, H, I, J, K, l, M, Moos Room, O, P, Q, R, A PEAS meant... , T(sc).  /  (b.s.) anacronism: Fiddle Sticks^, b, Primary Boogeyman, D(sc), E(sc),

4-3-13 to too two dimen(t)sionalism [!] ?

4-4-13  to boldly borg by G ?

4-16-13 follow up: not to link meaning nor emphasize leadership, history, dedication, debtedness. (but Ctrl F)

4-22-13 : Speaking of 4 mats ! (GW)
Or the Q T? "math later"
Q = arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy
T= grammar, logic, and rhetoric
Alternate Q = No Borg [!]

4-23-13 Ctrl F ? Faith, Filter and Fervor ? Frack 'n Fudge ?[!]?
4-24-13 third line : "pun on"  P.C. (b.s.)Rhythm /  Con Fluence..., Iron Knee of Inflation  (see fore)
4-25-13 Capitalizing on fonts(1) or elements(2) of #$ines (3). (R/R) (1) Clause Wits (sc), Give us a brake?, WTF?, (g), Charlotte 2012! , Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right.(sc), GPS , K, L, M, N?   (2) The %th EleFont  (3) (A) Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?  Bby Stiob?!?   (4) (a)Punderous Ponderings, B, C(c), (D)Un-Exceptionalism,(e)  
4-30-13 My intent was 'twain footnote and liveblog. Note the list of labels and missing reference to Checks and Balances to bring it to six.  Ctrl F [!]

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

Pre-Pan FRY.

i.e. NOT Fully Read Yet.
Pan= God of asterisks.***
BushNix unite[!]

That was lede or ship, or a spoiler alert of a headline. 
But I am going to stick my neck out or guess the point of what George Lakoff* may be meaning by Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.

But first I will be facitious** or tongue in cheek, which with the opposition such as it Roves and the Techs- Ass Governor as a frame of reference it may be closer to the reality.

A. They are elephants.
B. It is trickle down.
C. It is politics.
D. All of the above.

* apologies he has not had a Label
** I am at a striking disadvantage having read a book of his
[Now for the read.]
*** Ctrl F (kitchen)

[Now I will comment: Clause^ Wits and Meta4Wars[!]
(fn)

^  post (fn)
[Buy George, that war on X-mass.]

[Thanks to Norman Goldman and a caller
 for additional inspiration for a new metaFor,
the Fiscal Crypt.(see bubble analogy and 4moolah[!])]

FOOTNOTES PAGE APRIL 2014

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE
4-9-14 : Trinity of sorts? (s.c.) I will let the reader scroll or click(links 1,2 & 6) & an other trinity.
(b.s.) Not quite bingo or tic tack toe[!] ?  [Or in F'n Try-modal?]

4-10-14  EH?  ...]   >v./, vii. Score Won..., viii. More Money?, ix. Bring It On!, x., xi. The Jig is Up? , xii. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP 

4-17-14 Tzar Chasm or Bird Man: NewsNation/AM in the UCrane.  Diplomacy in the Snowden Error or Obamanomics.  Changing the conversation 'n turning the table & clause wits. 
 

Ctrl F "anachronistic"

blog search (b.s.) anachronistic*

(search: 4th dunn)
(b.s.) a. Anachronistic Reasoning?, b. Faux Campaign, c. FAUX NEWS!, (e.), f. Clause Wits (3.0)?, (g)host Busters, h. Roar Shack, i. A Tail of Caution, ( j. ), k. ether note, l. F'n P[!]  m. War'n Buffet Rule , n. By Polar , o. From 17A to 37B, p. Killing Fields of Dreams,  q. Future Bubble? , (r.).

*anomaly knot
(_) Rat Races Van Mices?, The LESS THAN pentagonal file:, Bury the lede?, Too Random...,

[ Picture Theory: 1. The Curve or Nuance Thing, 2. For Words!, (3.), 4. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy
Speaking of timing [!] Philosophy Now links may be free for limited time. Democracy is not.
On meaning. / War On/Or Terrorism ? , MoveOn , Decider Stays Course., FAST REVERSE or BACKTRACK BEFORE FAST TRACK , ]

Speculative Physics

Math is next to Godliness? ^
Or sixth sense?

Not just^ another Sunday ! ?

(Not that Socrates is alive[!])

[eff'notes: As of this time there are four lines above. Links inserted line 3, then 4, then 2.  Not to force or farce the model, but there is an event horizon.]

[ seg weigh ? ... is tough to track down ... ? ]

1-27-14  Not that I had any* mocumentary intent. But there was the Pro Bowl with intent to do something different and I had run across a YouTube on a different singularity.  Note that** my "sixth sense" is reference to the six edges of a tetrahedron which has four points.^^  My point of departure or parsing is that we may have a chicken and egg, not to mention crossing the road and sky dilemma.  While the singularities of Chomski and Hawking are different, that does not mean that we dismiss clause wits [!][?] ***

 

* Caging Godzillas 
^ or amer mots? French for "bitter words"
** further tangents?  (math and intelligence)
^^ at this point I will note that I have still to read three:
It's About Blackmail, Not National Security
Get Ready for Rand Paul
Stephen Hawking: Black Holes May Not Have 'Event Horizons' After All
Related ?




*** Our Hierarchy of Needs

[OW ? ! ? ? ]
And the past four ?
Foot notes ?
Not that there is anything in HeyDigger[!] butt ... ? [!] ?

^quote is my creation (recent search and non-related googles).

P.C.

In parsing convention or preemptive comment I will make the preemptive clause that it is better than preemptive conflict. Having said that, if it can be parsed civilly, I will pause constructively. Or rather, post concretely that I have yet to read these two that I feel may be in the balance of political craftiness.*

*Not only NFRY(not fully read yet) but link is only summary, I have a news stand copy to personally congest[!]

[!] a lazy pun on digest and play on PC or P. C.

(and or political con fusion NOT [!]**)

**

[more preemptive comment on parallel content]

Bermuda

Try Angle ? 

Before I tan gent:  It is a clear choice. 
It might B 2 late, butt...  'twain GWB and DC*, pre and post selection. 
Not to jump in the Lakoff, but it about Clause Wits** and spectral orders.

[Translation / D'Ribble?: 'tween Bush and world order, or between what Bush ran on(not being policeman to the world), and what America runs on(speaking of spectral orders), the three branches of government and who the heck they work for.  Do we want a second shot at getting democracy right or just war left?  OW!]

* (sc) later: Bush(43)/vP-resident Cheney
**to parse Clausewitz later(or higher archy)

FP(k)not: A. / B. c. D. E. F. trope? ***

*** not to Footnote but NFRY. (Not to bury Neo-Cons, but to place in the mix, nor Peter, Paul or Merry.

Politics Local and National

Find your local party organization.
DEMOCRATS
Republicans- not so easy
Liberals- at your own risk*
Conservatives
Green Party
Independents (you are on your own)
Libertarian or Ron Paul
Actually this was just a quick search which evolved from "find your(specified)organization" to find your specified "party", and my comments are more about the ease with which they are found.

As a local example: 41st LD Democrats **
Puget Sound Liberals
Northwest Progressive Institute
Progressive Radio
Organizing for America
Democracy for America
King County Democrats
Washington State Democrats

This may seem condescending, but what the Beck!
MoveOn
Think Progress The Final Act for Health Reform
Media Matters
not to mention Democrats.com Save our Democracy!

[BTW: two proposals(rhetorically)
a. If corporations have individual rights, where do they come off as being able to own other individuals?
b. And where does an individual share come in? I mean there is the equal protection clause but an individual gets one vote per share of stock?
c. It seems that congress should tighten up immigration when it comes to such commerce let alone labor.
Actually these could be substantive considerations.]

*if I can't offend my own, who can I offend, well maybe everyone, but I am being ironic with a keen political calculus. Actually my own is "progressive", and we must stop running with(or at or from) words like scissors.

** attendance at District Nominationg Convention and Caucus was surprisingly low, but could be attributed to the forgone conclusion that there would be no opposition to our incumbents, satisfaction with work being done, anticipation of the work to come, and the nature of the top two primary holding some surprises if not a field for competition from the wings of hope and cynicism.

Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

* (FP?)

Bane or Song,
Dutch Treat,
Trans-Parent C?
pair a digm / docs
who
ran A. The Maze of Mace, B. C3-PO?, D.TBA, E. Fair and Balanced..., F. Parallel (Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels
off


clock A., B. 11-30-11 , C. Reigning Wags and Tales. D. Refrain Post Frain?, E. Cut the Cow Pie! , F., G. Anachronism , H. I. Leveling the World Stage? , J. Initialism, K. L.


* 1. Spenserian Neo-Platonics?
2. All In?
3. Neo-Romulan
4. A. Speculative Physics, B., C. Pre-Pan FRY. , D. Clause Wits, E. Battle of Amendments?

Z Y X[?] budda bias?